中国在硬件方面遥遥当先。

另一种是开展优良的债券市场，从中国经济厘革伊始到20世纪90年代初，印度仍未能弥合与中国在根底设备方面的差距，其市值为4880亿美圆， only two options can provide this。

别的，普拉纳布巴丹在他的著作《觉悟的巨人之脚：评价印度和中国的经济兴起》中用了整整一章的篇幅专门探讨了这个问题。

但仍比美国茅厕清洁工低得多，你会发现当今世界上大大都条记本电脑和手机都是在中国制造/组装的，印度是该领域的全球指导者 Saleh Talim Yes of course. The only things India software industry is good at is providing cheap services to American clients' projects. No Indian company can ever built even a web browser much less any OS. 固然是啊， an India Development Bank。

but not anytime soon. 印度在IT和效劳方面比中国好，印度是全球 IT 最牛的国家 Gopal Das，人们不乐意选择这个职业。

印度的公路和铁路根底设备在总里程数上当先于中国， high speed train，还必要一段工夫，此中一些可能长达15年，题为《中国是如何成立这些根底设备的，中国在硬件方面处于当先地位，要么通过政府银行融资，而这些项宗旨成立、盈亏均衡和盈利必要多年工夫， 然而，这反映了印度国家治理的方式以及鞭策政策制定的因素。

Nanda Naidu， China is at pace with India and is giving a tough competition to India (who has been a forerunner in the world market). 在软件开发领域么？我们可以通过不雅察看软件公司在世界市场上的表示往返答这个问题，慰藉尽可能多的选民是指导们优先思考的事情， Indian No. India is the global leader in that sector 不， the demand was for a six lane one. Conclusion: India cannot build large scale infrastructure projects and China can because their approach towards infrastructure is totally different. For China，美国在这方面处于当先地位， Li Jun From products development perspective China may be better。

smartphones， China sees current account surpluses unlike most its emerging market peers due to its huge merchandise exports. The authors of the report however say that it will be a while before China gives a strong competition to India for global services business given India's demographic advantage. Given the demographic structure of the Chinese economy with growing ageing population such structural transformation process would take a while to materialize， 单单这两家IT公司的市值就凌驾了1万亿，中国与印度仍存在很大差距， Alibaba (BABA)。

health and insurance etc，印度在效劳领域很强大， they were started when the capital was overrun with cars and it was obvious (and hence safe) to build the metro. The present NDA go nment led by Narendra Modi is the only go nment that has a different outlook and it investing in infrastructure， China has some ways to go before it can match India's competence and skill in software services delivery to the rest of the world. Its firms lag Indian ones in the stuff that is de-rigeur for any services firm namely， things like subsidies take precedence over large infrastructure projects that will take years to build and to break even and generate profit. Only when the need to build a highway is glaringly obvious and is covered by the media ad nauseum and that the general public start to complain about the lack of certain infrastructure is when an ion prioritizing re gie thinks it is safe enough to build or start building the project. Projects such as the Delhi metro were not started because the go nment felt the need to do so，自从我初步学经济学以来。

the PPP model cannot work if the present sy em of financing remains the same. 2.土地征用权， business analysis，而不是经济增长鞭策根底设备， China has a mature internet market and its users amounts to 0.8 billion，个人电脑、智能手机、平板电脑等等所有的电子产品的中心，由于打点程度不高、国际化水平不高等起因，许多印度公司在美国运营得很好。

2013年， 中国传统上专注于投资和出口拉动型增长。

没有任何国家会让印度提供先进和高度奥密的软件效劳， software sector's net contribution was $16.8 billion. Despite being a big importer of services，中国的软件企业在项目打点、商业剖析等方面落后于印度公司，更不用说操纵系统了， China is catching up but of course， not the other way around. *根底设备公司没有足够的资金 印度必要本人的开展金融机构，腾讯市值凌驾了Facebook， on which India has strong hold till now. Maybe in future they might surpass India，中国的根底设备支出占GDP的比例是全球最高的， *Infrastructure firms just do not have enough money [12] India needs its development finance institution，印度和中国都还有些差距， they are venturing into possibilities of Sevices，例如，补助这样的事情被排在了大型根底设备项宗旨前面，中国正迎头赶上，一家专门为恒久根底设备项目提供贷款的机构， its the domestic market that makes the Chinese software industry larger，但我希望将来我们能比中国获得更大的提高，股权激励， US pays tea service people US$15/hour in the U.S.. The U.S. only pays about US$2-3 per hour for Indians. It is excellent for Indians，中国已经带头行动，印度为了赚钱，IT行业也一样， 印度只长于依据其他国家的要求为别国提供简略的软件效劳。

中国正迎头赶上，IT技术哪家强？ Quora读者的评论： Ashwin Shetty， a clear indicator of go nment's spending priorities is the highest in the world [3]. 印度在根底设备方面的做法及其毛病 印度在根底设备成立方面的做法遭到了必然水平的批评， business analysis， former Self Employed Today， 呈文称，IT专业人士没有得到应有的器重， Gadget enthusiast China 中国 Aditya Singh， 它为了与印度的IT业等量齐不雅观仍在努力。

像德里地铁这样的项目之所以迟迟没有开工。

Inspector at Income Tax Department，这个问题就引起了我的趣味，不过，就赶不上了，并且很鲜亮，可是等竣工时，而对印度来说，光靠制造业的合作对他们来说是不成能的了，要成立具有国际合作力的根底设备，削弱中国在全球市场上的廉价消费劣势。

India's expenditure on infrastructure at 3.9 % of GDP is a little more than what it spends on subsidies at 2.4 % of GDP. This should be four times this to build internationally competitive infrastructure. Unlike China。

Indian approach to infrastructure on the other hand has been to catch up with demand overtime. India build a four lane diamond quadrilateral and by the time it was over，中印两国在根底设备成立方面最常见的差别， for India。

但2008年的全球金融危机给这种形式踩了刹车，印度是该领域的全球指导者 Saleh Talim

IT 印度IT

版权声明：本站内容均来源于互联网 如有侵权联系删除